Point
The context write path keeps one identity
Cross-Map authoring retains the same Point id only for useful local significance of the same item, not for independently changing claims.
- Posture
- asserted
- Lifecycle
- active
Another Map can contribute a same-named context record when it has useful significance to add. An explained membership can be sufficient; matching subject matter or the ability to name another Map does not justify another record. Improve an existing local record rather than adding a duplicate.
A local explanation should describe why the Point matters. Put independently changing implementation facts in their own Points rather than repeating them as context. Title, kinds, posture, lifecycle, relations, and review metadata remain anchor-only. These boundaries concern meaning and identity, not a prescribed approval or edit lifecycle.
Contribution boundariesA local contribution can add perspective without copying canonical state or creating a competing identity.